Din gol se naște un plin,
Adâncul înaltul provoacă,
Răul te scapă de chin,
Uitarea în timpuri ne toacă,
Leac se ascunde-n venin,
...acesta e DARUL primit din senin!
Seminţe…
Când te găsești alergând gâfâind pe cărare
Şi viața îți pare o cursă în care
Doar cei mai rapizi ajung și înving,
Oprește-ți avântul spre visul perfid,
Găsește-ți cuvântul și gândul ferit
Ce-ascunde adânc adevărul mărunt
Şi toate le-ascultă, căci toate îți sunt
De mirare...
un dop poate sa aiba un scop?
nici un dop nu are un scop… pina nu gaseste o gaura fara ..aura, eventual mai mica decit el ca sa poata deveni model: iata cum poate sa devina altfel, sa fie mai mult decit un tel, sa poata opri tot ce se face inainte sau dupa …el; dar are intradevar un dop in el insusi un scop? daca marim dimensiunea putem vedea …minunea:
===========:
Does the Universe Have a Purpose?
Not Sure.
Anyone who expresses a more definitive response to the question is claiming access to knowledge not based on empirical foundations. This remarkably persistent way of thinking, common to most religions and some branches of philosophy, has failed badly in past efforts to understand, and thereby predict the operations of the universe and our place within it.
To assert that the universe has a purpose implies the universe has intent. And intent implies a desired outcome. But who would do the desiring? And what would a desired outcome be? That carbon-based life is inevitable? Or that sentient primates are life’s neurological pinnacle? Are answers to these questions even possible without expressing a profound bias of human sentiment? Of course humans were not around to ask these questions for 99.9999% of cosmic history. So if the purpose of the universe was to create humans then the cosmos was embarrassingly inefficient about it.
And if a further purpose of the universe was to create a fertile cradle for life, then our cosmic environment has got an odd way of showing it. Life on Earth, during more than 3.5 billion years of existence, has been persistently assaulted by natural sources of mayhem, death, and destruction. Ecological devastation exacted by volcanoes, climate change, earthquakes, tsunamis, storms, pestilence, and especially killer asteroids have left extinct 99.9% of all species that have ever lived here.
How about human life itself? If you are religious, you might declare that the purpose of life is to serve God. But if you’re one of the 100 billion bacteria living and working in a single centimeter of our lower intestine (rivaling, by the way, the total number of humans who have ever been born) you would give an entirely different answer. You might instead say that the purpose of human life is to provide you with a dark, but idyllic, anaerobic habitat of fecal matter.
So in the absence of human hubris, and after we filter out the delusional assessments it promotes within us, the universe looks more and more random. Whenever events that are purported to occur in our best interest are as numerous as other events that would just as soon kill us, then intent is hard, if not impossible, to assert. So while I cannot claim to know for sure whether or not the universe has a purpose, the case against it is strong, and visible to anyone who sees the universe as it is rather than as they wish it to be.
Neil deGrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and the Director of New York City’s Hayden Planetarium.
===================
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Fără concluzii care știi ce sunt... ("E o singură concluzie: totu-i o iluzie!")